Hype StackHypeStack

Use case

Project Management Agile Software

The tool does not make a team agile. It does decide how expensive it is to change your mind, which is the part worth shopping for.

Agile project management tools all show you the same screenshot: a board with columns, cards moving left to right, a burndown chart in the corner. The differences that matter show up three months in, when the team wants to change how work flows and finds out whether the tool bends or the team does.

We sell source code you clone and run yourself, so there is nothing here to sign up for and no hosted board product. Most teams searching for project management agile software should use Jira, Linear, or one of the free tiers below, and this page is more useful if it starts there rather than pretending otherwise.

What follows is what actually separates these tools, then the narrow case where teams end up building their own.

Agile is a set of practices, and the tool only touches some of them

Scrum and Kanban ask for different things from software, which is why a tool that feels right to one team feels obstructive to the next.

Scrum team
Kanban team
Unit of planning
A sprint with a fixed scope and end date
A continuous flow with a limit on work in progress
The number people argue about
Velocity, in story points per sprint
Cycle time, from start to done
What the tool must support
A backlog, estimation, sprint boundaries, a burndown
Column limits, an ageing view, flow metrics
Where the usual tool disappoints
Re-planning mid-sprint gets recorded as failure
Most tools bolt WIP limits on as an afterthought

The practical question when comparing products is not which methodology they claim to support. It is what happens when you want both, because most teams end up somewhere in between: sprints for planning conversations with people outside the team, and continuous flow for the work itself.

What to check before you commit a team to one

Four things are worth testing during a trial, and none of them appear on a feature grid.

How much ceremony a single change costs

Move one card to a different project, change an estimate, split a story in two. If any of those takes more than a few seconds or triggers a required field, multiply that by every standup for a year.

Whether the hierarchy matches how you actually talk

Epic, story, subtask is one opinion. Teams that think in outcomes and slices, or that run several products from one backlog, tend to fight it. Check whether you can rename and reshape the levels or only rename them.

What reporting assumes about your process

A burndown assumes a fixed sprint scope. A cumulative flow diagram assumes stable columns. Charts built on assumptions your team does not hold will quietly mislead the people who read them and never attend the standup.

How the data comes out

Boards accumulate several years of decisions and context. Before committing, check what a full export looks like and whether comments, history, and attachments come with it.

The free tiers are genuinely usable for small teams. Jira, Linear, GitHub Projects, and Trello all carry a team of a handful of people at no cost, and the seat maths only turns interesting somewhere north of twenty people. Those are other companies' products and their pricing is theirs to change, so check it rather than trusting a page like this one.

Why teams end up building anyway

Almost nobody should build a board. The teams that do usually are not building a board at all.

Who is the project tracking for?

Your own team, tracking your own work

Buy one. This is a solved problem.

  • Every product in this category does boards, backlogs, and sprints competently
  • The supporting systems you would rebuild are large: permissions, notifications, search, history, integrations
  • A custom board costs a developer permanently and does not make the team faster
Your customers, inside a product you sell

This is a product feature, not a project tool.

  • An agency portal where clients watch their own delivery is a multi-tenant app that happens to contain a board
  • You need organizations, per-customer isolation, roles, invitations, and billing before you need a burndown
  • Embedding a third-party board in your own product is usually worse than owning a small one

The second case is the one where a template earns its place, because most of the work is the application around the board rather than the board itself.

The second branch is a real and common shape. Agencies, consultancies, and software vendors all end up wanting a client-facing view of work in progress, and the tools in this category are built for internal teams rather than for being resold.

What you would start from here

There is no agile board in this stack, no sprints, no story points, and no burndown chart. What exists is one level below that.

The projects pack ships projects, tasks, and assignment, which is the data layer a board renders rather than the board itself. The starter gives you accounts, organizations, membership roles, and invitations, which is what "my client sees only their own delivery" is made of. Underneath is a Hono backend with Prisma and Kysely on Postgres, an admin app for support questions, and Stripe billing if you are selling the result rather than using it internally.

The parts you would write: sprint or iteration boundaries if you want Scrum, the estimate field and whatever you choose to measure, the drag-and-drop board itself on top of the task model, and the flow metrics. That last one is worth doing late, because the metric a team actually uses is rarely the one they said they wanted at the start.

If you are tracking your own team's work, close this and open a free tier. If you are building the client-facing version, the packs and screens below are the part that is not the board, which is most of it.

Hype Stack

What is Hype Stack?

Every product starts with the same month of work nobody pays you for: sign-up and login, teams and permissions, taking payments, notifications, an admin panel to run the business. Hype Stack is that month, already built and tested. Start from the free open-source app, add the pieces you need with one command, and keep going on the part that is actually your idea.

Everything lands as real code in your own repository, so there is nothing to rent and nothing anyone can switch off. For the engineers: React 19, Hono, Postgres, and a desktop build, typed end to end.

See it running

Templates are curated project starters built on this stack: a layout, feature packs, a custom theme, and bonus pages. The previews below are recordings of the real apps.

Packs in this stack

Every pack ships real source code: frontend, backend, and admin surfaces where the feature needs them. The ones this stack installs come first; the rest can be composed in later.

Two ways to install features

Same features underneath, different starting point. Either command resolves what the packs depend on, copies the source into your repository, and merges the Prisma schema.

Ready-made

Take a template

A landing page, a design system, a themed layout, and the features already wired into it. Rebrand it, put your product in the middle, ship.

$npx @hype-stack/cli template
Browse templates
From scratch

$ hype-stack compose

AuthTeams

Compose your own design

Your design and your choices, without rebuilding auth, billing, or notifications. Tick the packs you want and the CLI wires them into the open-source starter.

$npx @hype-stack/cli compose
Browse packs

Questions, answered

They ask for different things. Scrum needs a backlog, estimation, sprint boundaries, and a burndown. Kanban needs column limits, an ageing view, and flow metrics. Most teams end up in between, so the useful question during a trial is what happens when you want both rather than which methodology is listed on the pricing page.

More stacks

Turn your ideas into
Real applications.

Start free and own every line you ship. When you want more, one All-Access license unlocks every premium pack and template for a year.

All premium packsEvery template12 months of updates
Get All-Access