Source: https://www.hype-stack.dev/stacks/hype-stack-vs-supastarter # Hype Stack vs Supastarter: Compose Packs or Trim a Full Kit > Supastarter hands you a finished SaaS and a delete key. Hype Stack hands you an empty one and a command that writes > features in. Both are honest trades, and they suit different products. Supastarter is one of the more complete SaaS kits you can buy. It is a Turborepo monorepo for Next.js, Nuxt, or TanStack Start with authentication that goes well past email and password: passkeys, magic links, two-factor, OAuth, roles, a super-admin area, and user impersonation. Billing works across Lemon Squeezy, Stripe, Polar, Creem, and Dodo, in subscription, one-time, and usage-based shapes, with seat-based billing for organizations. There is i18n with translatable emails, an AI chatbot example with multiple adapters, and a changelog that moves every few days. If you are looking for a supastarter alternative because the kit is unmaintained or thin, you can stop reading: it is neither. The reasons people look around are structural, and this page is about those. Supastarter arrives as a full kit you trim. Hype Stack arrives as an MIT template with nothing in it and a CLI that composes packs into it. One ships more on day one. The other ships only what you asked for, across more platforms than a web app. ## What is in the box on day one Count features present the moment you clone, and Supastarter wins. That is worth saying plainly before the table that follows, because a comparison page that hides it is not one you should trust. **Present after the first install** | | Supastarter | Hype Stack | | --- | --- | --- | | Passkeys and two-factor authentication | yes | partial | | User impersonation from an admin area | yes | no | | Five or more payment providers | yes | partial | | Seat-based organization billing | yes | no | | AI chatbot example wired to the backend | yes | partial | | i18n with translatable emails | yes | yes | | Separate admin application | partial | yes | | Mobile app in the same repository | no | yes | | Browser extension in the same repository | no | yes | | Desktop build in the same repository | no | yes | _Supastarter column from its feature list and docs. Hype Stack column from the registry: multi-factor login comes from WorkOS AuthKit on that starter and is not wired in the Better Auth one, impersonation is not shipped, three billing providers ship as separate packs rather than one kit, the AI chat pack is paid, and seat-based billing is not in the catalog today._ Two rows deserve a note. Supastarter has a super-admin role and management screens inside the same app, which is why it scores partial rather than no on the admin row. Hype Stack ships three billing providers as three packs, so you install one and never see the other two, which is a smaller number in the table and a smaller number in your repository. ## Where the shapes differ | | Supastarter | Hype Stack | | --- | --- | --- | | What you clone | The full kit. Every feature is present, and you delete what the product does not need. | An empty MIT template. The CLI writes only the packs you pick, so there is nothing to strip. | | Backend | Inside the frontend framework's server runtime, with Prisma or Supabase behind it. | A standalone Hono service with Prisma migrations and Kysely queries on Postgres. Deploys on its own. | | Frontend | Next.js, Nuxt, or TanStack Start. Three frameworks to choose from. | React 19 with TanStack Router. One framework, typed routes and search params. | | Platforms | Web only. The three editions are three frameworks for the same browser app. | Web, admin, Expo mobile, a Chrome, Edge, and Firefox extension, and Electron desktop, from one repo. | | Updates | Git merges from upstream into your fork. Fast when your changes stay close to theirs. | Re-run the CLI for one pack, diff, merge. Smaller surface per update, equally manual. | | Price | One-time. $299 Solo, $799 Startup for five seats, $1,499 Agency for ten. | Template and five packs free. Paid packs one-time, yours for good. Full catalog $299 a year for one seat, $1,399 a year unlimited. Code stays after the year. | [See what each pack writes into the repo](/packs) The price row is a genuine trade, not a win for either side. Supastarter's one-time fee is lower over three years than three Solo renewals. Hype Stack's packs are one-time too: buy the two or three you need and they are yours, updates included. The yearly All-Access plan only makes sense once you want most of the catalog, and even then the code stays yours whether or not you renew. Which is cheaper depends on how many packs you expect to want. ## Where the code runs This is the largest practical difference and the one the feature lists do not show. Supastarter's three editions are three web frameworks. Every surface below ships in the free Hype Stack template, wired to the same backend and typed against the same routes. **Surfaces in the box** | | web | admin | mobile | desktop | extension | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Supastarter | ships | partial | none | none | none | | Hype Stack | ships | ships | ships | ships | ships | _Supastarter from its product pages, which describe Next.js, Nuxt, and TanStack Start editions and no mobile or extension target. Hype Stack from the template repository: apps for frontend, backend, admin, mobile, and extension, plus the Electron shell in the native app shell layout._ If the product will only ever be a web app, that grid is worth nothing to you and Supastarter's deeper day-one feature set is worth a lot. If a mobile app or an extension is on the roadmap, the grid is most of the decision: adding Expo to a Next.js kit later means a second codebase talking to an API that was designed for one client. ## How an update actually reaches you Both products leave you owning the source, which means neither can push an update into your repository. It is worth being exact about what each one asks you to do, because "lifetime updates" and "12 months of downloads" describe the same manual step with different accounting. **A billing fix ships upstream** 1. **Supastarter publishes a commit** — You add their repository as a remote, fetch, and merge into your fork. The merge covers the whole kit, so unrelated files you never touched can still conflict with files you did. (git merge) 2. **Hype Stack publishes a pack version** — You re-run compose for that one pack. The CLI rewrites the pack's files, merges its Prisma models, and leaves every other pack alone. Then you diff and keep what you want. (compose, then diff) 3. **Both: you own the result** — Nothing arrives automatically in either model. The difference is the size of the diff you read, and whether the update window is lifetime (Supastarter) or the year your licence covers (Hype Stack). ## Which one fits you **Is the product a web app, or a product that happens to have one?** - **Supastarter:** Pick it when the web app is the product and you want everything present on day one. - Next.js, Nuxt, or TanStack Start, with a kit built around that framework's server runtime - Passkeys, two-factor, impersonation, and seat billing without installing anything - One-time price, lifetime access to the repository, frequent releases - **Hype Stack:** Pick it when you want only the features you asked for, on more than one surface. - An MIT template with web, admin, mobile, extension, and desktop already wired to one backend - Packs composed in by a CLI, so the tree holds nothing you did not choose - A separate Hono backend that deploys and scales apart from the frontend _Both columns are recommendations. If you finish this page unsure, the question above the fork is the one to answer first._ Below is the stack this page recommends for a B2B product: the Better Auth starter with organizations and roles, the basic dashboard layout, Stripe billing, and team workspaces. Every one of them lands in your repository as source. The multi-platform comparison is in [Hype Stack vs TurboStarter](/stacks/hype-stack-vs-turbostarter), and the map of the whole market in [Best SaaS Boilerplate 2026](/stacks/best-saas-boilerplate-2026).